Reeves will have to raise taxes, charge for the NHS or ditch pensions triple lock, warns IMF

Rachel Reeves has been given her strongest warning yet that she will have to break a key party manifesto pledge by hiking taxes, introducing charges to use the NHS or dropping the triple lock guarantee on the state pension.

The beleaguered chancellor raised taxes by £40bn in her first Budget last year, partly to fund record new investment in the NHS.

But now the world’s most important financial watchdog has warned that she will likely have to break an election promise to raise “taxes on working people” – income tax, VAT or national insurance contributions by employees – to balance the books.

It comes as the business secretary Jonathan Reynolds has described demands by senior figures in Labour for wealth taxes to close the financial gap as “daft”.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves

Chancellor Rachel Reeves (PA)

In a report on the UK economy – Article IV Consultation with United Kingdom – the International Monetary Fund warned: “Unless the authorities revisit their commitment not to increase taxes on ‘working people’, further spending prioritisation will be required to align better the scope of public services with available resources.”

It went on: “The triple lock [guarantee on the state pension] could be replaced with a policy of indexing the state pension to the cost of living.

“Access to public services could also depend more on an individual’s capacity to pay, with charges levied on higher-income users, such as co-payments for health services, while shielding the vulnerable.

“There may also be scope to expand means testing of benefits.”

The challenges Ms Reeves is facing, the IMF said, included the impact of Donald Trump’s continuing tariff war with the rest of the world as well as “little fiscal headroom” in the UK finances.

Doctors are on strike over a 29 per cent pay rise demand

Doctors are on strike over a 29 per cent pay rise demand (AFP/Getty)

The warning could not come at a worse time for the chancellor, who is already facing heavy speculation that she could lose her job in a reshuffle as the economy continues to stagnate.

A tussle rumbles on within the government over a push to introduce wealth taxes, which Ms Reeves has been unable to rule out. At the forefront of demands for a wealth tax is deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, who sent the chancellor a memo with eight suggestions, including reinstating the pensions lifetime allowance and changing dividend taxes, ahead of the spring spending review.

And it is feared that Ms Reeves will again freeze income tax thresholds, dragging millions more people into paying income tax and paying the higher 40p and 45p rates.

Speaking to a podcast for GB News, Mr Reynolds, the business secretary, broke cover to reveal his opposition to a wealth tax after hearing warnings from the City.

He said: “There’s no kind of magic [tax]. We’re not going to do anything daft like that.”

Mr Reynolds added: “I say to people [on the left of Labour]: ‘Be serious about this.’ The idea you can just levy everyone… What if your wealth was not in your bank account, [what if it was] in fine wine or art?”

He added: “This Labour government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income – the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax.”

Mr Reynolds is understood to be reflecting the opinion of Ms Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer on resisting wealth taxes, but there is a concern from some that the majority involved with the government “hate wealth”.

And with resident doctors striking over a 29 per cent pay rise demand hitting the government this week – and concerns that strikes could spread to other sectors – Ms Reeves is also coming under further pressure from the unions to find extra money for wage packages with little financial flexibility.

The Treasury pointed out that the IMF had been complimentary of Ms Reeves’ overall strategy in the “Plan for Change”, which it said “strike a good balance between supporting growth and safeguarding fiscal sustainability”.

It said: “The authorities’ Growth Mission covers the right areas to lift productivity.”

Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was questioned about tax policy (PA)

Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was questioned about tax policy (PA) (PA Wire)

But added it warned “prioritising and sequencing of structural reforms, along with clear communication, will be key to success”.

The UK economy is predicted to grow by just 1.2 per cent according to the report, although this is still up from previous levels.

Responding to the report, Ms Reeves said: “Today’s IMF report confirms that the choices we’ve taken have ensured Britain’s economic recovery is underway, and that our plans will tackle the deep-rooted economic challenges that we inherited in the face of global headwinds.

“Our fiscal rules allow us to confront those challenges by investing in Britain’s renewal. We’re committing billions of pounds into improving transport connections, providing record funding for affordable homes, as well as backing major projects like Sizewell C to drive economic growth. There’s more to do, and that’s why we’re slashing unnecessary red tape and unblocking investment to let British businesses thrive and put more money in working people’s pockets.”

But opponents seized on the report as yet more evidence that Ms Reeves’ strategy is not working.

Tory shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: “This is yet more confirmation that Labour’s mismanagement means yet more tax rises are coming in the autumn.

“The IMF’s conclusion is clear – the chancellor has already maxed out the credit card, her only options are to cut spending or raise taxes. The welfare debacle showed Labour are completely incapable of reining in spending. Businesses and families must brace for an even higher tax burden.

“The IMF also confirm that Labour’s jobs tax means fewer jobs, lower wages and higher prices for working families.

“Be in no doubt, this mess is down to Labour’s choices, and it is the working people Labour claim to be protecting who are paying the price.”